Jon Treadway, Director at Great North Wood Consulting, delivered the opening keynote, outlining the challenges facing scholarly communication. He highlighted the shift towards isolationism in the geopolitical landscape, impacting scientific collaboration. Treadway emphasized that scholarly communication remains inefficient and fragmented, with AI advancements posing both opportunities and risks. He cautioned that AI’s rapid progress demands vigilance and noted that Open Access has yet to reach its full potential due to siloed discussions rather than collaborative efforts. 

The first panel focused on ensuring transparency and trustworthiness in research. Panelists included Leslie McIntosh, Vice President of Research Integrity at Digital Science; Laura Wilson, Head of Research Integrity & Ethics at Taylor & Francis; Jennifer Wright, Head of Publication Ethics & Research Integrity at Cambridge University Press; and Doug Melville, Technical Product Manager at Sage. Key concerns discussed were AI’s impact on research, the need for transparent licensing conditions, and the challenge of ensuring research security. The panel emphasized that publishers play a critical role in upholding standards, holding the “gold” in narratives and research culture. Collaboration across the industry, especially in disambiguating author identities and spotting bad actors, was stressed as vital to safeguarding integrity.

Ann Campbell, Technical Solutions Manager at Digital Science, and Katie Davison, Insights Analyst at Emerald Publishing, presented a case study on how they’ve worked together to leverage Dimensions on GBQ for data-driven insights. They demonstrated how combining Emerald Publishing’s strategic goals with Dimensions’ extensive dataset allowed them to uncover valuable insights about research trends, author collaborations, and institutional impact. By harnessing these insights, Emerald was able to identify key growth areas, refine their editorial strategies, and better align their publishing efforts with the needs of the academic community.

The second panel addressed how publishers are adapting their strategies in response to evolving social media platforms. The panel included Lou Peck, CEO & Founder of The International Bunch; Jitske de Vries, Head of Marketing at The Company of Biologists; Rowena Gordon, Senior Managing Editor at the British Ecological Society; Daisy Veysey, Social Media Manager at eLife; and Marion Schnelle, Social Media Manager at De Gruyter Brill. Discussions highlighted the emergence of platforms like Mastodon and Bluesky as an alternative to X (formerly Twitter). It was raised that in a poll of 6000 readers of Nature, 70% had moved over from X to Bluesky declaring the platform nicer, kinder and less antagonistic. The panel also raised a growing emphasis on community-building strategies over traditional marketing tactics among publishers. 

Next, Sarah Greaves, Director and Publishing Consultant at Sarah Greaves STEM Consulting, discussed the ongoing trend of consolidation in the publishing industry. She explored how mergers and acquisitions are reshaping the landscape, the potential benefits of improved efficiencies, and concerns about reduced diversity and potential monopolistic behaviors. 

Our lightning talks provided valuable insights into our latest innovations for publishers. Nicholas Bailey, our Senior Product Manager, introduced Dimensions Author Check, our new research integrity tool designed to help publishers verify potential authors, editors, and reviewers. Meanwhile, Mike Taylor, Head of Data Insights, showcased the Altmetric Journal Benchmark dashboard – a powerful resource for publishers seeking to measure success, benchmark their journals against competitors, and identify growth opportunities.

In the closing keynote, Jo Wixon, Director of External Analysis at Wiley, explored how publishers can actively contribute to advancing the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). She emphasized the growing importance of aligning publishing practices with global sustainability efforts, showcasing strategies for integrating SDG-related content and metrics into editorial workflows, peer review processes, and publication strategies. By adopting these practices, publishers can amplify research that addresses critical global challenges while enhancing their impact within the academic community.

Our 2025 Publisher Day highlighted both the opportunities and challenges publishers face in adapting to AI advancements, strengthening research integrity, and responding to shifts in social media landscapes. With increasing consolidation and technological disruption, the industry must work collaboratively to ensure the integrity, accessibility, and credibility of scholarly communication.

About the Author

Olivia King, Marketing Segment Lead, Publisher | Digital Science

Olivia King is Marketing Segment Lead for the Publisher segment at Digital Science. In this role, she manages the marketing activities and strategy across the Digital Science publisher solutions, including Altmetric and Dimensions. Before joining Digital Science, Olivia worked in journals marketing at Sage Publishing.

The post Publisher Day 2025: Key Insights on Integrity, Disruption, and Innovation in Scholarly Publishing appeared first on Digital Science.

Research Transformation: navigating change together

4th – 5th March

Sydney, Australia

Register to Attend

Our latest insights delivered straight to your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay updated on the latest developments in the research ecosystem, as well as insights into the latest news from Digital Science.

The post DS APAC Agenda 2025 appeared first on Digital Science.

Research Transformation: navigating change together

4th – 5th March

Sydney, Australia

Register to Attend

Our latest insights delivered straight to your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay updated on the latest developments in the research ecosystem, as well as insights into the latest news from Digital Science.

The post DS APAC 2025 appeared first on Digital Science.

Traditionally, September and October have always been one of the busiest – and most interesting – times to be in the publishing industry. Back in the day, September would be the deadline for the first of the following year’s issues to be collated by editors, while in more recent times big events like the ALPSP Conference, the Frankfurt Book Fair and Open Access Week have set the agenda for the remainder of the year and beyond.

In 2024, this period has perhaps more intrigue than most given a number of deadlines and political events occurring in the next 12 months or so, many of them revolving around open access (OA) and its further adoption. But will things pan out the way people anticipate, and are there solutions that can be used to help forge a path through so many uncertainties about the future?

Conference season

At the recent ALPSP Conference in Manchester in September, there was a good deal of discussion about how open access had developed this year, and its potential progress in 2025 and beyond. Perhaps unsurprisingly at a conference full of publishers, the mood was a little downbeat when it came to the theme of OA, but not for the reasons one might think. Reading between the lines, there was a frustration at the shifting sands many felt they had to constantly navigate, in the shape of changing or newly introduced policies, and a sense that innovation was being stymied as a result.

For example, the tone for OA seemed to have been set by the JISC report on transformative agreements (TAs) which was published in the UK earlier in 2024. This made for somber reading, with the headline prediction that while the UK’s transitioning to OA was faster than most countries, based on the journal flipping rates observed between 2018–2022 it would take at least 70 years for the big five publishers to flip their TA titles to OA. 

With this in mind, the fact that there were deadlines for Plan S set for 2025 around transition that seemed unlikely to be met, and with the OSTP memo in the US mired in committees and a potential change on the cards in the White House, the belief among many publishers was that the move to OA was not happening at the pace or in the direction that many thought it would.

Geopolitical calculations

In addition to what is happening in the UK, Europe and in the US, events further afield are also causing publishers to take stock of their medium-to-long-term strategies. The publication of authors based in Russia has declined sharply since the invasion of Ukraine in early 2022, and collaboration between US authors and those based in China have also decreased, possibly due to policy changes by the Chinese government favoring publication in China-based journals, but also potentially due to fears about research security issues in the US and in other countries. 

China’s move to OA is also happening at a much lower level than many countries, which is significant as it takes up such a high percentage of published articles, passing the US a few years ago as the world’s most prolific publisher of research articles. As a result, despite the increase in the number of TAs being agreed with universities, publishers are still seeing a high degree of uncertainty in the transition to OA.

Forward motion

This uncertainty will be in the back of publishers’ minds when celebrating OA Week this year, coming as it does every year on the back of major conferences such as ALPSP and Frankfurt, and in the midst of fine tuning budgets for the following year. At Digital Science, we understand this predicament given how closely we work with publishers as customers, and also because many of us have worked in the publishing industry ourselves. As such, we have been analyzing how Digital Science solutions can help publishers steer a path forward on OA and transformative agreements, and have created this use case for Dimensions in support of our community.

This resource has been designed to reflect the period of change that the publishing industry is undergoing, supporting the need for publishers to create, evaluate and negotiate TAs by delivering a strong range of historical and predictive data through Dimensions. Using the Dimensions database – which now holds data on almost 150m publications as well as details on funding, grants and patents – publishers can easily find and analyze data surrounding authorship across categories such as country, geography, institution and funder. Understanding a given discipline’s current or future state of play can complement publishers’ own data and inform their strategies accordingly.

Solid state

The theme of this year’s OA Week – ‘Community over Commercialization’ – is a deliberately provocative one, and should engender a good deal of debate during the week and beyond. It should also broaden the conversation to adjacent areas such as open research and open science, as here we have policy and geopolitics making waves for everyone involved in the research ecosystem. 

The origin of some of these ripples can be seen in two upcoming reports from Digital Science. At the end of October, a new report on Research Transformation includes substantial input from those involved in academia on how OA is impacting on their work, while November sees the ninth annual State of Open Data report, tracking how researchers see open data issues developing as part of their work. Without giving too much away, both of these reports call for greater awareness of – and support using – the myriad of fast-developing technologies that are starting to impact academics and their institutions. As such, the community of interest that supports OA Week every year needs to work together in the ecosystem they all inhabit if those OA deadlines are to be met.

About the Author

Simon Linacre, Head of Content, Brand & Press | Digital Science

Simon has 20 years’ experience in scholarly communications. He has lectured and published on the topics of bibliometrics, publication ethics and research impact, and has recently authored a book on predatory publishing. Simon is an ALPSP tutor and has also served as a COPE Trustee.

The post Will 2025 be a turning point for Open Access? appeared first on Digital Science.

Digital Science is proud to support SRAI members

Get In Touch

How can we support you?

Our solutions and expertise offer exclusive access to global data to support your goals and improve decision-making around your research investments across the entire research lifecycle.

Our latest insights delivered straight to your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay updated on the latest developments in the research ecosystem, as well as insights into the latest news from Digital Science.

The post SRAI 2024 appeared first on Digital Science.

At this year’s World Conference on Research Integrity, a team of researchers from Digital Science led by Pritha Sarkar presented a poster with findings from their deep dive on conflict of interest (COI) statements. Entitled Conflict of Interest: A data driven approach to categorisation of COI statements, the initial goal was to look at COI statements with a view to creating a binary model that determines whether a Conflict of Interest statement is present or not in an article. 

However, all was not as it seemed. While some articles had no COI and some had one present, those present covered a number of different areas, which led the team to think COIs might represent a spectrum rather than binary options.

Gold standard

Conflict of interest is a crucial aspect of academic integrity. Properly declaring a COI statement is essential for other researchers to assess any potential bias in scholarly articles. However, those same researchers often encounter COI statements that are either inadequate or misleading in some way even if they are present. 

The Digital Science team – all working on research integrity with Dimensions – soon realized the data could be leveraged further to better explore the richness inherent in the nuanced COI statements. After further research and analysis, it became clear that COI statements could be categorized into six distinct types:

1. None Declared
2. Membership or Employment
3. Funds Received
4. Shareholder, Stakeholder or Ownership
5. Personal Relationship
6. Donation

This analysis involved manually annotating hundreds of COI statements with Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools. The aim was to create a gold standard that could be used to categorize all other COI statements, however despite the team’s diligence a significant challenge persisted in the shape of ‘data skewness’ – which can be defined as an imbalance in the distribution of data within a dataset that can impact data processing and analytics.

Fatal flaw

One irresistible conclusion to the data skewness was a simple one – that authors weren’t truthfully reporting their conflicts of interest. But could this really be true?

The gold standard approach came from manually and expertly annotating COI statements to develop an auto-annotation process. However, despite the algorithm’s ability to auto-annotate 33,812 papers in just 15 minutes, the skewness that had been initially identified persisted, leading to the false reporting theory for authors (see Figure 1 of COI Poster). 

To firm up this hypothesis, when the Retraction Watch database was analyzed, the troubling trend, including the discrepancy between reported COI category and retraction reason, became even more apparent (see Figure 2 of the COI Poster). 

Moreover, when the team continued with the investigation, they found there were 24,289 overlapping papers in Dimensions GBQ and Retraction Watch, and among those papers, 393 were retracted due to conflict of interest. Out of those 393 papers, 134 had a COI statement, however 119 declared there was no conflict to declare.

Conclusion

Underreporting and misreporting conflict of interest statements or types can undermine the integrity of scholarly work. Other research integrity issues around paper mills, plagiarism and predatory journals have already damaged the trust the public has with published research, so further problems with COIs can only worsen the situation. With the evidence of these findings, it is clear that all stakeholders in the research publication process must adopt standard practices on reporting critical trust markers such as COI to uphold the transparency and honesty in scholarly endeavors. 

To finish on a positive note, this research poster was awarded second-place at the 2024 World Conference on Research Integrity, showing that the team’s research has already attracted considerable attention among those who seek to safeguard research integrity and trust in science.

You can find the poster on Figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25901707.v2

Partial data and the code for this project are also available on Figshare.

For more on the topic of research integrity, see details of Digital Science’s Catalyst Grant award for 2024, which focuses on digital solutions around this topic.

About the Author

Simon Linacre, Head of Content, Brand & Press | Digital Science

Simon has 20 years’ experience in scholarly communications. He has lectured and published on the topics of bibliometrics, publication ethics and research impact, and has recently authored a book on predatory publishing. Simon is an ALPSP tutor and has also served as a COPE Trustee.

The post Shining a light on conflict of interest statements appeared first on Digital Science.

Research strategy

Research funding

Research impact and evaluation

Research management

Research security

Research integrity

Research collaboration

Research compliance

Our vision is of a future where a trusted and collaborative research ecosystem drives progress for all. 

Discover how our AI-enabled solutions can provide valuable insights and solutions to support decision making across the entire research lifecycle – from strategy development, to impact measurement and showcasing.

How can we support you?

Research strategy

Access unrivalled data and insights to analyze the funding landscape, enhance decision making and address critical questions

Find out more

Research impact & evaluation

Objectively pinpoint strengths, measure influence and deliver trustworthy information to help strengthen and elevate the influence of research recognition

Find out more

Research funding

Analyze awarded grants and pinpoint potential collaborators for more compelling grant applications

Find out more

Research management

Integrate and optimize research workflows and effectively manage data to maximize funding and showcase results.

Find out more

Research collaboration

Navigate the research landscape to uncover new opportunities for academic and industry collaboration. Empower researchers to seamlessly collaborate and share their findings, fostering a dynamic and interconnected research community.

Find out more

Research security

Better understand your research security risks, assess foreign influence, review potential research collaborations and be compliant to safeguard your institution’s reputation, its researchers and funding.

Find out more

Open research

Empower and enhance transparency across the research ecosystem. Cultivate a knowledge sharing environment and provide robust support to researchers in light of mandates.

Find out more

Upcoming webinar

In partnership with EARMA, our panel will delve into the evolving open research landscape and look at how data captured throughout the research lifecycle can uncover insights and boat research impact

Find out more

Academia is at a pivotal juncture. It has often been criticized as slow to change, but external pressures from an increasingly complex world are forcing rapid change in the sector.

To understand more about how the research world is transforming, what’s influencing change, and how roles are impacted, we reached out to the research community through a global survey and in-depth interviews.

Download report

Digital Science commits to Open Principles

Setting out Digital Science’s commitment to Open Research now and into the future

Read now

Case study: Tracking SDGs

How Carnegie Mellon University tracks SDGs using Symplectic Elements

Read now

Making data a priority

How universities can extract and utilize verified data from the increasing sources using Dimensions

Read now

Research transformation

A new campaign from Digital Science looks at how research can transform society at large

Read now

The Higher Education Technology Agenda (THETA) 2025

25th May 2025 | Australia

Conference

Join us in Perth for THETA 2025.

Find out more

Bibliometrics and Research Impact Community (BRIC) 2025 Conference

3rd June 2025 | Canada

Conference

EUNIS Congress

3rd June 2025 | Ireland

Sponsor

ARMS 2025

10th September 2025 | Australia

Conference

Our latest insights delivered straight to your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay updated on the latest developments in the research ecosystem, as well as insights into the latest news from Digital Science.

The post Research leaders appeared first on Digital Science.

Research strategy

Research funding

Research impact and evaluation

Research management

Research security

Research integrity

Research collaboration

Research compliance

Our vision is of a future where a trusted and collaborative research ecosystem drives progress for all. 

Discover how our AI-enabled solutions can provide the valuable insights and solutions you need to empower researchers to advance the research lifecycle and make open, collaborative and inclusive research possible.

How can we support you?

Open research

Empower and enhance transparency across the research ecosystem. Cultivate a knowledge sharing environment and provide robust support to researchers

Find out more

Research impact and evaluation

Objectively pinpoint strengths, measure influence and deliver trustworthy information to help strengthen and elevate the influence of research recognition

Find out more

Research management

Integrate and optimize research workflows and effectively manage data to maximize funding and showcase results

Find out more

Research collaboration

Empower researchers to seamlessly collaborate and share their findings, fostering a dynamic and interconnected research community

Find out more

Academia is at a pivotal juncture. It has often been criticised as slow to change, but external pressures from an increasingly complex world are forcing rapid change in the sector.

To understand more about how the research world is transforming, what’s influencing change, and how roles are impacted, we reached out to the research community through a global survey and in-depth interviews.

Download report

Mind the trust gap

How do we hold on to the sanctity of science and ‘mind the trust gap’ that some perceive?

Read now

Research transformation

A new campaign from Digital Science looks at how research can transform society at large

Read now

Case study: Expertise search solution

How the University of Oxford implemented Symplectic Elements as an expertise search solution

Read now

A new approach for AI

Introducing an integration between Dimensions and ChatGPT for a new way to research data

Read now

The Higher Education Technology Agenda (THETA) 2025

25th May 2025 | Australia

Conference

Join us in Perth for THETA 2025.

Find out more

Bibliometrics and Research Impact Community (BRIC) 2025 Conference

3rd June 2025 | Canada

Conference

EUNIS Congress

3rd June 2025 | Ireland

Sponsor

ARMS 2025

10th September 2025 | Australia

Conference

Our latest insights delivered straight to your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay updated on the latest developments in the research ecosystem, as well as insights into the latest news from Digital Science.

The post Librarian appeared first on Digital Science.

Research strategy

Research funding

Research impact and evaluation

Research management

Research security

Research integrity

Research compliance

Supporting research collaboration

Our solutions can help paint a more complete picture of the research landscape, equipping you with the tools and insights needed to identify new collaboration opportunities and empowering researchers to seamlessly collaborate and showcase the results and impact of their work across the community.

On this page

How can I see existing collaborations?

Establish an overview of existing partnerships with various institutions, organizations and countries worldwide, so you are well placed to connect faculty members with experts to enhance research, and select partnerships to nurture.

Access extensive data points to help you to measure the success of existing partnership programs.

Discover Dimensions

Support external collaborations in the writing process, and access data to see which organizations are being collaborated with.

Discover Overleaf

See how Overleaf helped The University of Manchester increase and track collaborations with external universities by 278%

Jeffrey Holmes, the Dean of Engineering at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, explains how Dimensions has supported their hiring process and their search for better collaborations.

How can I identify potential partners? 

Identify researchers with a common research mission within a specific field of research and pinpoint opportunistic areas for focus and talent acquisition.

Discover Dimensions

How can I find new industry collaborators? 

Increasing access to funding via strategic partnerships within the industry for tech transfer and commercialization opportunities that can be crucial for fostering innovation and driving growth.

Dimensions can be a valuable resource in identifying organizations that have received industry partnership grants, enabling you to pinpoint suitable businesses for potential partnership or alliance formation.

Discover Dimensions

Using Dimensions to identify potential collaborators within the industry

How can I make collaborating with external teams easier?

Overleaf is collaborative by design. With commenting, real-time track changes, document history, and more, it makes writing together easier, whether that’s a student working with their professor or a research group collaborating with another organization anywhere in the world.

Discover Overleaf

How can I find funder information?

Discover funding sources for your strategically important areas of research, and drill down to see specific information including the country.

Discover Dimensions

How can I help our internal team collaborate better? 

Take academic research collaboration to the next level with Papers – a reference management solution that helps teams simplify the way they work together by improving the way they discover, organize, read, annotate, share, and cite research.

Discover Papers

How can I best showcase equipment and services?

Symplectic Elements can serve as a catalyst for tech transfer by providing a centralised platform for industry-academic collaboration, facilitating the exchange of knowledge and resources, and driving the commercialisation of research innovations for the benefit of society.

Discover Symplectic Elements

Case study: University of Toronto uses Symplectic Elements to showcase expertise through public researcher profiles

How can I showcase our expertise? 

Attract recognition for academic achievements and researcher expertise through public facing profiles, opening up new routes to impact discovery, collaboration, and partnership.

Discover Symplectic Elements

Latest insights

Social science and innovation

A new report shows how vital social sciences are to STM and innovation in the UK

Read now

Collaboration, competition and curiosity

An interview with Nobel Prize-winner Venki Ramakrishnan

Read now

How to find KOLs for collaboration

Using Dimensions and Altmetric to identify key opinion leaders

Read now

Figshare supporting research collaboration

Why one university has launched a Figshare institutional repository to share, showcase and manage its creative and scholarly outputs

Read now

Our latest insights delivered straight to your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay updated on the latest developments in the research ecosystem, as well as insights into the latest news from Digital Science.

The post Research collaboration appeared first on Digital Science.

Research strategy

Research funding

Research impact and evaluation

Research management

Research security

Research integrity

Research collaboration

Supporting research compliance

Over the past decade, there has been a global shift from 70% of all publishing being closed access to over half being open access. Now, institutions worldwide are required to ensure compliance with government and funding bodies’ policies on open access, open data mandates, as well as reporting and tracking requirements.

Our Research Information Management (RIMs) solutions make data sharing easy, enabling you to focus on tracking and monitoring compliance. 

On this page

How can I support faculty in navigating the Open Access landscape?

In The State of Open Data 2023, nearly three-quarters of researchers said they had never received support for making their data openly available.

Maturing your research management infrastructure and support offerings is crucial to effectively support your research community with growing funder and publisher requirements for open research. 

Figshare repository infrastructure and Symplectic Elements work together to provide a holistic research management solution; reducing administrative burden, creating efficiencies for your team and offering best-in-class research management systems for your researchers and faculty.

Discover Figshare

Discover Symplectic Elements

How Figshare meets the Office of Science and Technology Policy’s (OSTP) Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories for Federally Funded Research

How can I reduce the complexity of compliance for researchers? 

Meet 100% of the desirable characteristics of data repositories for federally funded research, laid out by The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) themselves: 

• Free and easy access 
• Clear use guidance
• Retention policy
• Long-term organizational sustainability 
• Unique persistent identifiers  
• Metadata 
• Broad and measured reuse 
• Provenance 
• Authentication 
• Long-term technical sustainability 
• Security & integrity

How can I track and monitor my institution’s compliance?

Collect and report on research inputs, outputs, outcomes, and professional activities, to ensure you have the data you need to meet reporting requirements.

To help inform internal quality judgements, Symplectic Elements integrates with a wide range of external data sources, automatically harvesting a range of metrics from sources including; Dimensions, Web of Science, Scopus, Europe PMC and Altmetric.

Discover Symplectic Elements

Symplectic’s Open Access Monitor was pretty critical to our REF open access compliance monitoring – I can’t really imagine doing without it.

Open Access Compliance Manager | University College London

How can I demonstrate to funders that researchers have undergone thorough vetting?

Funders of research in sensitive areas – such as defense technology – have strict requirements pertaining to researchers involved with such projects. Effectively conduct due diligence to:

• Surface international collaborations on publications and grants, view past & current affiliations, related IP & clinical trials
• Analyze international funders acknowledged on potential researchers’ publications
• Identify undisclosed collaborations or international funding sources that may put your institution’s grant application at risk

Discover Dimensions Research Security

How can ensure compliance with federal and governmental regulations in your hiring decisions?

Identify potential risks to your research security, verify disclosures, and review research networks with Dimensions Research Security. 

New and emerging mandatory research security regulations can often mean fines, penalties, reputational damage and the potential loss of stakeholder trust and funding for academic institutions found non-compliant. 

Easily guide your hiring decisions and protect your institution with Dimensions Research Security – an easy-to-use and powerful solution combining visual dashboards with data drawn from the world’s largest global research information database.

Discover Dimensions Research Security

Latest insights

Compliance tasks

How a new app can make it easy to assess potential research security risks and thoroughly review potential researcher collaborations quickly

Read now

Ensuring research security

How Dimensions Research Security can assess potential risk, complete compliance tasks and build trust.

Read now

Ensuring research security and integrity

How to protect international collaboration and foreign contributions critical to the success of research

Read now

Mind the trust gap

How do we hold on to the sanctity of science and ‘mind the trust gap’ that some perceive?

Read now

Our latest insights delivered straight to your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay updated on the latest developments in the research ecosystem, as well as insights into the latest news from Digital Science.

The post Research compliance appeared first on Digital Science.